Benchmark Links

Posted on 由

General Benchmark Databases

Owned Hardware

  • (3 years)
  • WD EALX 1.0TB harddisk, buy: 2011-03-18
  • Toshiba 750G USB3.0 harddisk, buy: 2011-08-30
  • LG W2353V 23″ LCD Display, buy: 2010-01-21
  • GTR R450 450W PSU, buy: 2010-03-19
  • WD WD3200AAKS 320G harddisk, buy: 2007-08-29, dead: 2012-03
  • WD WD3202ABYS 320G harddisk, buy: 2008-09-06
  • ASRock A780GMH/128M, buy: 2009-06-29
  • (5 years)
  • Seagate ST9160821AS 160G USB2.0 harddisk, buy: 2007-09-12
  • WD 640G 6401AALS, buy: 2008-11-30 to 2013-11-30
  • WD 640G 6400AAKS, buy: 2008-08-24 to 2013-08-24
  • (No Warranty)
  • LG W1942T 19″ LCD Display, buy: 2009-02-22

Software Timing

  • True Image 9.7 high compress backup 32G Win7 C:, different harddisk, 12 min
  • Windows 7 Upgrade RC to RTM, AMD Phenom II 3.1G + 8G RAM, 1h

USB 3.0 USB Keys

Memory

Memory Card

Harddisk

Compress Software

  • Hardware: Phoenom II 550BE 3.1Ghz x 2, 8G DDR2-800 RAM, WD 1002FAEX 1TB SATA3
    • When unlocked, similar as a Phenom II X4 955 3.2Ghz (3.5% slower), Passmark ~4000
  • Software: Windows 7 Ultimate, WinRAR 4.01 64bit, 7-Zip 9.20

    • Test File: 456.7M VMware disk file
    • WinRAR
      • Fastest: 110.2M, 0:15 (24.1%, 3.5x faster)
      • Fast: 96.6M, 0:52 (21.2%, 100% time)
      • Normal: 91.0M, 1:01 (19.9%, 17% slower)
      • Good: 90.4M, 1:12 (19.8%, 38.5% slower)
      • Best: 90.1M, 1:23 (19.7%, 59.6% slower)
    • 7-Zip
      • Fastest: 95.8M, 0:31 (21.0%, 42% faster)
      • Fast: 91.8M, 0:44 (20.1%, 100% time)
      • Normal: 77.5M, 1:42 (17.0%, 2.3x slower)
      • Maximum: 72.8M, 2:18 (15.9%, 3.1x slower)
      • Ultra: 71.3M, 2:15 (15.6%, 3.1x slower)
  • Hardware: Athlon64 X2 3800+ 2.0Ghz x2, 2G DDR2-667 RAM, WD2000JB 200G ATA100
  • Software: WinXP Pro, WinRAR 3.7b7, compress to same disk, Multithread
    • WinRAR on VMware 2.00GB w2k3r2
      • Fastest, 921,526kB, 5m 15s
      • Fast, 841,903kB, 10m (9.1%, 80M smaller)
    • Hardware: Celeron 1.2G, 1G DDR266 RAM, WD2000JB 200G ATA100
    • Software: WinXP Pro, WinRAR 3.6b7, compress to same disk
    • WinRAR on VMware 25.5M disk
      • Fastest, 4s, 3.53M/13.84%
      • Fast, 10s, 2.62M/10.27% (34.8% better)
      • Normal, 14s, 2.58M/10.12% (1.5% better)
    • WinRAR on VMware 418M disk
      • Fastest, 136s/2:16, 167.5M/40.07% (base, 1x time)
      • Fast, 396s/6:36, 149.2M/35.7% (12.4% better, 2.9x time)
      • Normal, 509s/8:29, 147.3M/35.24% (1.3% better, 3.7x time)
      • Fastest decomp, 36s
      • Fast decomp, 33s
      • Normal decomp, 31s

Display Card

  • GeForce GTX 650 Ti

    (GTX650 Ti and GTX660 is price/performance in proportional)
    1920×1080 highest quality usually can get 35fps to 45fps

  • Anandtech: GTX 460 256bit vs GTX 460 192bit (256bit is 10% better)
  • GTX 560SE vs GTX 460
  • GeForce GTX 460
  • HD 4850
  • GeForce GT 240
  • Entry Grade Display Cards
  • GDDR3 vs GDDR5 real world performance maybe just 8%
  • Adobe Premiere Pro CS5 benchmark
    Compare nVIDIA CUDA performance, no AMD CPU here
  • Video Cards for Adobe Premiere CS5 and CS5.5
    Explain the MPE in Adobe Premiere and the effect of nVIDIA CUDA cores (10x+ performance gain, require 1G RAM VGA card. Intel CPU with SSE4.1+ is additional 3x faster than AMD.)
  • NotebookCheck: Compare display chip performance 
    GTX 650 Ti ~= 95-100% (Especially after 4xAA)
GTX 560 ~= 107%
GTX 460 = 100%

Crysis: Warhead (2008) Medium 0xAA/0xAF
GTX 260 = 41
HD 5770 = 34
HD 4850 = 33
HD 4770 = 30
9800 GT = 28
9600 GT = 27
GT 240 = 17

Crysis: Warhead (2008) Ultra [1920x1200 EntQuality 4xAA]
Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti ($1180-1230) = 24.5
GTX 460 SE = 21.64 (8xAA DX10)
ATI HD 5770 = 18.7
Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 = 17.8
Nvidia GeForce GTX 550 Ti = 17.7
ATI X1900 = 9 (low = 47)

Crysis (2007) High [1024x768 High 0xAA/0AF]
GTX 460 = 141%
GTX 260 = 100% (2x 6pin power)

Mafia 2 (2010) High [1366x768 high 0xAA 16xAF]
Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti ($1150) = ~83
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M (~GTX650 $850) = 61
ATI HD 4850 = 45.7 (2nd hand $450)

Mafia 2 (2010) Ultra [1920x1080 high 0xAA 16xAF]
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 1G = 61
GTX 460	1G ~= 60.5? (worth ~$725)
GTX 460 SE 1G ~= 55 (worth ~$675)
HD 5830 ~= 54
HD 5770 1G = 50 (worth ~$600)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti ($1150) = ~50
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M (~GTX650 $850) = 37
Nvidia GeForce GT 240 GDDR5 = 32 (2nd hand $299)
ATI HD 4850 = 29.5 (2nd hand $450, new $700-800)

Need for Speed Shift (2009) High [1366x768 high/on 4xAA TriAF]
ATI HD 4850 = 47 (2nd hand $450)
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M (~GTX650 $850) = 45
ATI HD 6650M = 33 (2nd hand HD6670 $420)
ATI HD 4670 = 25.6 (2nd hand $199)
    (Compare 3D Mark 05 Standard 1024x768 / 
3dmark06 1024x768 / 3dmark vantage 1024x768)
nVidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti = (3dmark06:22997)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470M = 18.8x (23057, 3dmark06:16509 22.22x) - similar to GTX 560 Ti
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M = 18.46x (22648, 3dmark06:15223 20.49x)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660M = 16.98x (20831.7, 3dmark06:15117 20.35x)
ATI HD 7850M = (3dmark06:14111 18.99x)
Nvidia GeForce GT 650 = 17.3x (21266, 3dmark06:13719 18.46x)
Nvidia GeForce GT 640M LE = 14x? (3dmark06: 9992 13.45x)
ATI HD 6850M = 13.8x (16944) ~1.1x of GTX 550 Ti
ATI HD 5850 = 12.44x (15260)
ATI HD 4850 = 12.55x (15400, 3dmark06:9842 13.25x)
ATI HD 5650 = 10.2x (12518)
ATI X1950 Pro = 8x (~9300-10529 /avg9900,3dmark06;~5226 7.03x)
Intel GMA HD4000 = 7.64x (9374, 3dmark06: 5322 7.16x)
ATI HD 5550 = 637% (3dmark06,1280x1024:4735)
ATI X1900(GT) = 580% (7117)
ATI HD 5450 = 508% (3dmark06:3776)
ATI HD 4350 = 4.85x (5952, 3dmark06: 3141 4.23x)
Nvidia GeForce 305M = 417% (3dmark06:3101)
* Nvidia GT218 ION2 = 311% (3821) run with Atom D525
Nvidia GeForce 9300M = 267% (3270)
ATI HD 4290 (890GX)
ATI HD 4250 (880G) = 279% (3423)
* Nvidia GT218 ION2 = 253% (3098) run with Atom N450
ATI HD 4200 (785G) = 249% (3051)
Intel GMA HD = 234% (2872, 3dmark06:1530) Core i3/i5 build-in
ATI HD 4225 = 196% (2400)
ATI HD 3300 (790GX)
ATI HD 3200 (780G) = 189% (2324)
Intel GMA 4500MHD = 100% (1227, 3dmark06:743) run with C2D SU2300 1.2Ghz
ATI X1270 = 80% (983)
Intel GMA X3100 = 66% (805) run with C2D 1.4-2.2Ghz
Intel GMA 950 = 33% (407) run with C2D T2300 1.66Ghz
* Intel GMA X3150 = 24% (298) run with Atom N4xx ~1.6Ghz
* Intel GMA 950 = 20% (249) run with Atom N270 1.6Ghz
VIA Crome 9 = 19% (227)
Intel GMA 500 = 11% (135)
  • Tom’s Hardware VGA Charts
  • Updated: AMD 785G: The Venerable 780G, Evolved
    Compare HD3200 and HD4200, FPS almost same, HD playback 25-50% better
  • New chipset AMD 880G review
    Compare 785G, 880G, 890GX with benchmark
    880G/890GX More Improved video playback quality
  • HD4770 Power Usage
    HD4770: Core i7@3.2G, Load: 147/198w, Temp: 65
    HD4830: Core i7@3.2G, Load: 148/213w, Temp: 90
  • X1950 Pro vs HD4850 mini review
  • ASUS X1950 Pro Power Usage
    X1950 Pro: E6600@3.0G, Load: 156/220w
  • Radeon HD4770, 40nm
  • Geforce GTX 550 Ti vs GTX 560 Ti spec compare
  • Anandtech: Radeon HD6790 benchmark (Include GTX 550 / GTX560)
  • Tomshardware: AMD 790GX (HD3300) benchmark
    30% better than 780G (HD3200) w/sideport memory, 60% better than 780G w/o sideport memory. HDD also seems around 2.5% better and power around 5% less.

LCD Monitor

Global Market

發表迴響 (評論)